Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Do you think McCain even bothered to look Sarah Palin up on Wikipedia? You know, what with the secessionist videos on YouTube and all?

Dear Republicans,

THANK YOU. You have made my August/early September better x1million,

Yours faithfully,



( 33 comments — Leave a comment )
Sep. 2nd, 2008 04:37 pm (UTC)
There was a bit in the Monday NYTimes to the effect that someone calling himself YoungTrigg edited her Wikipedia page within an inch of its life -- at 4am the morning before she was announced. Gave it detail, filled in stuff, flattering as all get-out. Left off, needless to say, most of the gaffes we've seen since. No word on whether Sarah Palin's mom has a Wikipedia username.

The Times managed to track down a fellow Wikipedian who had come along later the same day and edited some sense back into the entry; he wouldn't give his real name (although he consented to an interview) because he was a corporate lawyer and didn't want his clients to know he played around on Wikipedia (presumably, while billing them $500/hr).
Sep. 2nd, 2008 04:53 pm (UTC)
This is what I mean. I had read about the Wikipedia stunt and marvelled that not only was it done with a newly created and now deleted account, the account was named the same as one of her children. I think I like a little bit more native cunning in a politician -- and fortunately British politicians are slicker than greased weasel shite. Which is nice.
Sep. 2nd, 2008 04:54 pm (UTC)

Interesting, since her "youngest" (the child with Down Syndrome) is named "Trig".
(no subject) - veejane - Sep. 2nd, 2008 05:40 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - infinitemonkeys - Sep. 2nd, 2008 06:57 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - veejane - Sep. 2nd, 2008 07:17 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - infinitemonkeys - Sep. 2nd, 2008 08:13 pm (UTC) - Expand
Sep. 2nd, 2008 04:55 pm (UTC)
It would seem the McCain camp did very little vetting of Palin at all. "Hey, she's a WOMAN and a governor. Let's get HER. That will make all the little wimmins vote for us!"

Sep. 2nd, 2008 08:15 pm (UTC)
It's really a case of "all your wimmins are belong to us" gone spectacularly wrong. I *hope*. I can't believe they didn't just chuck her name into google, YouTube et al though and find this stuff out. I've thought lots of things about the Republican political machine but never that it was incompetent.
Sep. 2nd, 2008 05:07 pm (UTC)
Idiots, idiots, idiots...
Also, bozos.
Sep. 2nd, 2008 08:16 pm (UTC)
Yes. These people want to run the country. They can't do a google image search. There should be an inquiry somewhere
Sep. 2nd, 2008 05:20 pm (UTC)
It's almost enough to make you believe in God, and that She's voting for Obama.
Sep. 2nd, 2008 08:23 pm (UTC)
It does almost make me hopeful that it's all going to go tits-up for the party currently in power. It feels to me, watching from a distance over here, that John McCain is not clever and has an ego that could be seen from *space*. I can't see how he'll keep a lid on it when facing the elegant, eloquent Obama during the debates.

But then I live in a country that voted the Tories in four times in a row even though by the fourth time I was so certain they would lose that I cried when they didn't. So hope only gets you so far

(Deleted comment)
Sep. 2nd, 2008 08:27 pm (UTC)
All your us are belong to base. No? Never mind
But isn't Lieberman something of a petulant shitweasel too?

As for Sarah Palin, she has added to the gaity of nations hugely, what with the strangely named children and the hating on polar bears. Long may she continue to have skeletons rattling in her cupboard.
(Deleted comment)
(Deleted comment)
(Deleted comment)
Sep. 2nd, 2008 06:17 pm (UTC)
I am still just going HAHA HA HA HA.

I have little reaction other than that.
Sep. 2nd, 2008 06:39 pm (UTC)
Yeah, we're all laughing now, but we'll be crying next January when she gets inaugurated. Maybe I'm a pessimist, but I think that unless something definitive happens with the ethics scandal between now and November, McCain just won the election.

I think Lieberman wouldn't have done him any good. The Republicans have made such hash of things for the past eight years, there's no way McCain was ever going to attract enough of the remaining moderates to his cause, no matter what. His only hope was to motivate all the religious kooks who were iffy about him, and he just did it. They're wetting their pants in joy over the amazing Sarah Palin and her wonderful "culture of life" and I think I have to stop now before I throw up.
(Deleted comment)
(no subject) - infinitemonkeys - Sep. 2nd, 2008 08:35 pm (UTC) - Expand
(Deleted comment)
(no subject) - infinitemonkeys - Sep. 2nd, 2008 09:23 pm (UTC) - Expand
(Deleted comment)
(no subject) - k2daisy - Sep. 3rd, 2008 01:08 am (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - loligo - Sep. 2nd, 2008 09:53 pm (UTC) - Expand
(no subject) - infinitemonkeys - Sep. 2nd, 2008 08:32 pm (UTC) - Expand
Sep. 2nd, 2008 11:59 pm (UTC)
It either means the Dems are going to win (Palin is an incredibly stupid choice overall, base motivator or no) or that the Repubs have already fixed the election in battleground states so they don't really give a shit.

Guess which one I believe.
( 33 comments — Leave a comment )